October 10, 2004
Dear Concerned and Questioning Americans,
I have read and was astounded
and dismayed by “Painful
New Pearl Harbor”, and “In Plane
Site”, all about the facts surrounding the 9/11 terrorist attacks. I had
believed the administration’s conspiracy theory that 19 terrorists had attacked
us. I thought that perhaps the military had screwed up royally. I am now convinced
that it is the Bush administration’s “conspiracy theory” that is absurd; that
19 screw-ups, who couldn’t do anything right, somehow defeated the entire
US Air Force, CIA, FBI, NSA, and multiple airport security screenings. This
unbelievable “official” “conspiracy theory” has now been rubber stamped by
the 9/11 Commission Report (http://www.9-11commission.gov)
which, according to Harper’s Magazine (October 2004) and other
investigators, is a “whitewash”, full of errors, lies, and omissions. Senator
Mark Dayton of
I will give free copies to fire stations, police stations, judges, prosecutors, and politicians
this number to order the books and videos: 1-800-630-9012 Leave a message and someone will get back to you.
Leave a message and someone will get back to you.
Please go to www.reopen911.org
to sign the petition to reopen the 911 investigation!
Please go to www.reopen911.org to sign the petition to reopen the 911 investigation!
Researchers I hired have confirmed the following. You be the judge.
“The WTC was probably one of the more resistant tall buildings….they
just don’t build them as tough as the
Q “A steel building survived fires in experiments with extreme temperatures beyond the range possible with jet fuel.” – Cardington fire tests. www.corusconstruction.com/legacy/fire/images/fireres_section15.pdf
Q No steel building has ever been destroyed by fire – Fire Engineering Magazine
Q “The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time.” Federal Emergency Management Agency. www.fema.gov/library/wtcstudy.shtm Chapter 5 Page 31 May 2002
The investigation of the WTC “is a half-baked farce.” - Fire Engineering
Magazine. Jan 2002
Q All of the important evidence from the disaster was destroyed, illegally, and before the investigation was even concluded, some before it began! – Fire Engineering. http://fe.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=OnlineArticles&SubSection=Display&PUBLICATION_ID=25&ARTICLE_ID=131225 ; http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/science/hsy77747.000/hsy77747_0f.htm
$600,000 was spent investigating the WTC collapses vs. $40 million on
Q Building 7 at the WTC, 47 floors, steel, and constructed differently from the twin towers, fell at 5:30 but it was never hit by an airplane, had no significant fire!
Q Jet fuel burns at too low a temperature to significantly harm steel. The black smoke means that the fire did not reach the maximum temperature for jet fuel.
Q The fires were not long enough (only 1-2 hours) to harm the steel.
Q Yet days later, there were “hot spots” in the building that still exceeded the maximum temperature possible from jet fuel – but not from explosives. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0405/ofr-01-0405.html
Q The gusting wind on the towers had at times been greater than the impact of the airliners. Neither tower was bent nor did they creak or groan at any time. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/buildingbig/wonder/structure/world_trade.html http://www.skyscrapersafety.org/html/article_20040619_nyt.html
Q The buildings collapsed at the maximum speed of gravity – impossible without explosives! (Each floor hit would have slowed the fall some, more at the beginning.)
Q The concrete was encased in a steel framed pan yet clouds of finely pulverized concrete and steel beams came shooting out of the buildings for up to three times the width of the building at hundreds of miles per hour - only possible with explosives.
Q If the force of the falling building is strong enough to pulverize concrete then the bolts and rivets would have to hold beyond that force – and then give way. Yet the force to pulverize concrete into fine powder is greater than the force that sheers or stretches steel bolts and rivets. It cannot be both ways.
Both impacts and fires in the
Q “I’m still to this day amazed that he [alleged pilot on Flight 77] could have flown into the Pentagon," according to the hijackers pilot instructor. "He could not fly at all." Yet, “The steep turn was so smooth, the sources say, it's clear there was no fight for control going on. And the complex maneuver suggests the hijackers had better flying skills than many investigators first believed.” http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20A11FD35550C778CDDAC0894DA404482
NATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON THE UNITED STATES, Public
Hearing, Friday, May 23, 2003: Mr.
Mineta: “There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president,
"The plane [Flight 77] is 50 miles out…. 30 miles…10 miles out” – Cheney
knew this plane was coming at Washington and the Pentagon and yet no planes had
been scrambled to protect Washington after over 1 hour since the WTC was
attacked. Even at 400 miles per hour, it takes over 7 minutes to travel 50
miles, more since the plane was at altitude. Cheney knew the plane was coming
when it was even farther away since Mr. Mineta had not been present when Flight
77 was first reported to Mr. Cheney. They had known this flight was missing for
over an hour after the first plane crashed into the
Q NORAD successfully intercepted off course and suspected hijackings 67 times during the year prior to 9/11 (AP, 8/13/02). An Air Force F-15 “scrambles” to 29,000 feet in 2.5 minutes, normally intercepting in 15 minutes. Yet on that morning they were not one, not two, not three, but four (4) failures -- three (3) after they knew the planes were high-jacked and intended mass murder. http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/071204_final_fraud.shtml I Further suggest that you read, “Crossing the Rubicon”, by Michael Ruppert, which indicts Richard Cheney by detailing his involvement in the NORAD diversions from intercepting the high-jacked airplanes
This book is very disturbing. One thing is for certain; the facts surrounding the multiple WTC building collapses and Pentagon attack prove our government is not telling us the whole truth. I shudder to think what this book seems to prove is true. Ask your friends who are experts on the topics covered. I am now convinced that it was not just an error of omission. It seems clear to me that someone executed a master of deception’s plan and killed thousands of innocent people. Osama and Bush may just be patsies [people to take the blame].
I would love to have your view once you have read it. If you are an engineer, download our simple spreadsheet, fill in the blanks and expand it to prove or disprove your/anyone’s theory. TowerHeatMass.xls $10,000 prize to any full blown proof of how the Towers Collapsed. You must answer everything in the spreadsheet and expand it to cover all the details an engineer would know to consider.
I am also appalled by
the media. We commissioned a Zogby Poll that reported that 66% of New Yorkers wanted the
9/11 investigation re-opened. Moreover, it found that 49% thought that VIP's in
the government knew and did nothing. The New York Times did not think this was
"news fit to print". See
I will send at least one free copy to any fire station, police precinct, judge, or politician.
It is my intention to amass enough petition signatures and influence enough people to force the reopening of the 911 Commission and a criminal investigation by the Attorney General of NY into the mass murders that were perpetrated at the WTC. If anyone would like to have a meeting with me, please call my associate, Debra Olson at +1 (310) 573-1401 or email:firstname.lastname@example.org. We have launched a new web site www.reopen911.org Please go there to have more of your questions answered and PLEASE sign our online petition. Do it now. Please.
Demand that your government answer these questions that the 9/11 commission ignored and lied about.
James W Walter, Jr.
Walden Three, Inc. email@example.com
P.S. Mr. Huftschmid looks for conspiracies and asks intelligent questions. Secrecy begs questions. Being right or wrong on one issue is not proof of right or wrong on another. He unnecessarily complicates things with questions about the Kennedy assassination on which I am not commenting, pro or con. Logically, who would be the least afraid of ridicule and first to find a conspiracy? Remember that in the legend, the wolf did finally come.
Call this number to order the books and videos: 1 (800) 442-3977