Concerned and Questioning Americans,
everyone else, I watched the planes
hit the World Trade towers and then
saw them collapse. Like everyone
else, I believed the impact from
the planes and the ensuing fires
caused the collapses.
everyone else, because of the attack
I became concerned about terrorism.
I started researching what was happening.
I read the international press and
internet news which had stories
that never saw the light of day
or were deeply buried or ridiculed
in the US press. They clearly showed
that Saddam Hussein did NOT have
weapons of mass destruction, did
NOT have poison factories, and,
in fact, FOUGHT Al-Qaeda tooth and
nail as an arch enemy. But what
really scared me was that invading
Iraq would swell the terrorist ranks,
increase terrorism here and abroad,
and leave us in a Vietnam Quagmire.
It was obvious that tremendous deceptions
were being perpetrated on us by
our own government and the mainstream
media. In January of 2003 when Colin
Powell again lied to us and the
UN, I became so alarmed that I ran
full page ads in the New York Times,
USAToday, and various other newspapers
across the country. I was censored
by the LA Times. I was ignored by
shut up when the war started in
order to support the troops. After
I went around the country to protests.
I met Eric Hufschmid who had written
I got his book and video, but never
gave it the time of day –
At worst, I thought, 9/11 was a
sin of omission where the administration
allowed it to happen as an excuse
for their world domination purposes.
Until then, I had believed the administration’s
that 19 screw-ups from Saudi Arabia
who flunked out of flight school
had attacked us. I
did NOT believe that explosives
were used to destroy the World Trade
Six months later, a friend cajoled
me into watching Eric’s video,
It was an epiphany. After watching
the CNN and other main stream News
videos of the alleged collapses,
I knew explosives were used.
I was further astounded by the books “The New Pearl Harbor”, and “Crossing the Rubicon”, and even more so by the
Plane Site” and “The
Great Conspiracy”. I now know this is the ridiculous “conspiracy
theory” which has been rubber stamped
by the 9/11
Commission which, according
Mark Dayton, and others, is
a “whitewash” full of errors, “lies”,
will give free copies to fire stations,
police stations, judges, prosecutors,
and politicians (email:email@example.com).
None of these books or videos are
perfect. Some of the authors contest
each others work.
Researchers I hired have confirmed the following.
You be the judge. Unlike
most new things that get less good,
less perfect as you know them better,
this has just got surer and surer, deeper
and deeper. As they said in the Matrix,
keep reading this site and see “how
deep this rabbit hole goes”. I
really do feel like I took the red pill.
“A steel building survived fires in experiments with extreme temperatures
beyond the range possible with jet
” – Cardington
No steel building has ever been destroyed by fire – Fire Engineering Magazine
“The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to
collapse remain unknown at this time.”
Federal Emergency Management Administration.
5 Page 31 May 2002
All of the important evidence from the disaster was destroyed, illegally,
and before the investigation was even
concluded, some before it began! –
$600,000 was spent investigating
the WTC collapses vs. $40 million
on Clinton’s sex life. The entire
Commission only spent $15 million
while all expenditures on Clinton’s
indiscretion exceed $65 million.
The South Tower
(Building #2) fell after 1 hour; the
(Building #1) fell after 2 hours.
burned fiercely for 19 hours and never
Building 7 at the WTC, 47 floors, steel, and constructed differently from
the twin towers, fell at 5:30 but
it was never hit by an airplane, had
no significant fire!
Jet fuel burns at too low a temperature to significantly harm steel. The
black smoke means that the fire did
not reach the maximum temperature
for jet fuel.
The fires were not long enough (only 1-2 hours) to harm the steel.
Yet days later, there were “hot
spots” in the building that still
exceeded the maximum temperature possible
from jet fuel – but not from explosives.
The buildings collapsed at the maximum speed of gravity – impossible
without explosives! (Each floor
hit would have slowed the fall some,
more at the beginning.)
The concrete was encased in a steel framed pan yet clouds of finely pulverized
concrete and steel beams came shooting
out of the buildings for up to three
times the width of the building at
hundreds of miles per hour - only
possible with explosives.
If the force of the falling building is strong enough to pulverize concrete
then the bolts and rivets would have
to hold beyond that force – and then
give way. Yet the force to pulverize
concrete into fine powder is greater
than the force that sheers or stretches
steel bolts and rivets. It cannot
be both ways.
Both impacts and fires in the Twin
did not hit the center of the buildings.
That means that only two sides of
the building were harmed at most and
two sides were structurally sound.
Building 7 had no impact or significant
fires. Yet all three collapses are
perfectly straight down. Only the
tops of the Twin
should have fallen over, not the entire
building fall straight down, just
like a controlled
NATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON THE UNITED STATES, Public
Hearing, Friday, May 23, 2003:
Mr. Mineta: “There was a young
man who had come in and said to the
vice president, "The plane [Flight
77] is 50 miles out…. 30 miles…10
miles out” – Cheney knew this plane
was coming at Washington and the Pentagon
and yet no planes had been scrambled
to protect Washington after over 1
hour since the WTC was attacked. Even
at 400 miles per hour, it takes over
7 minutes to travel 50 miles, more
since the plane was at altitude. Cheney
knew the plane was coming when it
was even farther away since Mr. Mineta
had not been present when Flight 77
was first reported to Mr. Cheney.
They had known this flight was missing
for over an hour after the first plane
crashed into the North Tower.
There should have been an umbrella
of F-16 and other aircraft over Washington, DC.
An F-16 fighter can travel 50 miles
and destroy a target in less than
2 minutes. Moreover, pictures released
by the Pentagon show anti-aircraft
missiles firing at an aircraft much
smaller than a 757. Everything failed!
Incompetence, if not guilt
NORAD successfully intercepted off
course and suspected hijackings 100%
of 67 times during the year prior
to 9/11 (AP, 8/13/02), each time in
under 20 minutes. An Air Force F-15
“scrambles” to 29,000 feet in 2.5
minutes, normally intercepting in
15 minutes. Yet on 9/11 they were
four failures for over an hour each
-- three after they knew the planes
were high-jacked and intended mass
murder. Please read, “Crossing
the Rubicon”, by Michael Ruppert,
Richard Cheney for his involvement
in the war
games that diverted our interceptors
from stopping the high-jacked airplanes.
Contrast this to Condoleezza Rice's
statement from her May 16, 2002 press
briefing, “I don’t think anybody could
have predicted that these people would
try to use an airplane as a missile,
a hijacked airplane as a missile”.
“Condoleezza Rice was the top National
Security official with President Bush
at the July 2001 G-8 summit in on
Genoa. This was where U.S. officials
were warned that Islamic terrorists
might attempt to crash an airliner
into the summit, which prompted officials
to close the airspace over Genoa and
station anti-aircraft guns at the
“On August 6, 2001, just over a month
before 9/11 and during the "summer
of threat", President Bush
received a Presidential Daily Briefing
(PDB) at his Crawford, Texas ranch,
entitled Bin Laden Determined to
Strike in the US The August 6th
memo focused entirely on the possibility
of terrorist attacks inside the
US. In testimony before the 9/11
Commission, Condoleezza Rice, National
Security Advisor to President Bush,
stated to the 9/11 Commission that
she and President Bush considered
the August 6th PDB as just an historical
document and commented that this
was not considered a domestic warning.
At this 9/11 hearing, Condoleezza
Rice had taken an oath to tell the
truth to the Commissioners. [Perjury!]
“Additionally, according to the 9/11
Commission report, chief White
House expert on terrorism, Richard
Clarke, sent Rice an urgent memo
just days after she took office
stressing the severity of the
terrorist threat. She did not
respond. Although the national
security leadership met formally
nearly 100 times in the months
prior to the Sept. 11 attacks
. . . terrorism was the topic
during only two of those sessions.
The first meeting that dealt with
al Qaeda did not occur until 9/4/01.”
the 9/11 widows letter on “Kindasleazy”
I am also appalled by the media.
Poll I commissioned reported
that 66% of New Yorkers want the
9/11 investigation re-opened and
49% believe government VIP's knew
ahead of time and did nothing to
stop it. The New York Times thought
it NOT “news fit to print”. I had
to pay for an advertisement to get
it in the New York Times!
This book is very disturbing. One thing is for certain;
the facts surrounding the multiple
WTC building collapses and Pentagon
attack prove our government is not
telling us the whole truth. I shudder
to think what this book seems to prove
is true. Ask your friends who are
experts on the topics covered. I am
now convinced that it was not just
an error of omission. It seems clear
to me that someone executed a master
of deception’s plan and killed thousands
of innocent people. Osama and Bush
may just be patsies [people to take
It is my intention to amass enough petition signatures
and influence enough people to force
the reopening of the 911 Commission
and a criminal investigation by
the Attorney General of NY and the
District Attorney of Manhattan into
the mass murders that were perpetrated
at the WTC. Please,
PLEASE sign our online petition. Do it now. Please.
Please call your Representative, Senators, and the President demanding
our government answer these questions
and explain the 9/11 Commission’s
omissions and lies.
Demand that your government answer
these questions that the 9/11 commission
ignored and lied about.
James W Walter, Jr.
P.S. Mr. Huftschmid looks for
conspiracies and asks intelligent questions.
Secrecy begs questions. Being right or wrong
on one issue is not proof of right or wrong
on another. He unnecessarily complicates
things with questions about the Kennedy
assassination on which I am not commenting,
pro or con. Logically, who would be the
least afraid of ridicule and first to find
a conspiracy? Remember that in the legend,
the wolf did finally come.
Michael Ruppert is also controversial. Click on his
name to hear what those he opposes say of him.